What are the differences between storage scalability and elasticity?
Storage scalability is commonly measured in terms of capacity and performance. Capacity scalability is how much capacity the storage system can address, manage and support with acceptable performance. There are several storage systems that can address a lot of capacity as long as acceptable performance isn't a requirement. There are others that can address, support and manage even more capacity while maintaining acceptable performance regardless of the scale. Performance scalability is the storage system's ability to scale performance with or without capacity in the form of IOPS and/or throughput. These are terms most storage pros are familiar with.
However, elasticity is a relatively new storage concept. It originated with grid technologies, server virtualization and the cloud. It refers to the capability of a storage system to adapt to variable workload changes by allocating and deallocating resources as required by each application. That allocation and deallocation occurs in real-time and is based on defaults or pre-established policies -- without human intervention. The key issue is the ability to respond to both increased and decreased demands as they're happening autonomically. This is especially important for storage compute, storage memory and storage caching.
Storage resource demand is, for the most part, a lumpy, non-linear process with imperfect predictability -- there are always ebbs and flows. Not all applications require peak performance all the time. Some applications may require peak resources at the end of a quarter or during the early morning hours. Others may not require peak resources except during a specific quarter during the year, such as retail. Elasticity allows the system to respond to the "lumpiness" of the demand cost-effectively. When a storage system does not have elasticity, the storage admin must plan for the worst and build out that storage system for the very peak of demand for all applications concurrently. Doing so enables smooth operations during peak demand, but it does require overprovisioning and buying excessive processing, memory, cache and capacity. This is extremely inefficient and costly.
Finally, if a storage system is elastic, then the feature is built into the software. If the elasticity is in the hypervisor -- VMware VSAN -- it's also built-in, but with more limitations.
Related Q&A from Marc Staimer
A hard disk drive failure can put bytes of data at risk. Is multi-copy mirroring or erasure coding the more efficient data protection approach?continue reading
Marc Staimer of Dragon Slayer Consulting explains what causes read disturbs and how flash vendors are mitigating the issue.continue reading
Marc Staimer of Dragon Slayer Consulting compares NVDIMM and memory channel flash, explaining the advantages and disadvantages of each.continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.