Access your Pro+ Content below.
Caveat emptor now applies to your cloud storage provider
This article is part of the November 2013 Vol. 12 No. 9 issue of Storage magazine
A big cloud storage provider stumbles and everyone gets just a wee bit nervous -- but there are lessons to be learned, according to Editorial Director Rich Castagna. A lot of smart people who know an awful lot about storage have been telling us that the days of companies actually buying their own storage and managing it are numbered. Everything will move into the cloud, they say, and typically they make their case for the end-of-the-data-center-as-we-know-it scenario based on economics. And they can paint a pretty persuasive picture at times. After all, nobody needs a lot of convincing if the alternative promises equal or better service than what you have, while providing relief from fluctuating capacity and workload requirements. All that (and more) for less than what you're currently paying for storage gear and maintenance. Maybe even a lot less if launching your data into the cloud also means that your requirements for on-site expertise are reduced. Just think: No more nerve-racking RAID rebuilds, weekends spent migrating ...
Access this Pro+ Content for Free!
Features in this issue
The heavy workloads remain but the pay is a little better and the benefits are a plus. Our data storage salary survey 2013 paints a favorable picture.
DR has become tougher due to ever-changing virtual environments. Ensure your disaster recovery plan testing runs smoothly with DR monitoring tools.
There are two basic types of big data analytics—synchronous and asynchronous—but both have big data storage appetites and specialized needs.
We asked survey respondents about the effectiveness of the storage management tool they're using in their computing environments and the capabilities they require in a tool.
Columns in this issue
A big cloud storage provider stumbles and everyone gets just a wee bit nervous—but there are lessons to be learned.
All this talk about software-defined storage seems to be missing the point. Hasn't software always defined properly constructed IT infrastructure?
With SMB 3.0 included in Windows Server 2012, using Windows file sharing for virtual environments is much faster, safer and easier.
In the near future, data storage won't be a passive player as it integrates more closely with applications and workloads.